نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه آموزشی حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مراغه، مراغه، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکترا، گروه آموزشی حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مراغه، مراغه، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
This article is a descriptive-analytical method written with library tools. The findings of this study also show that from the point of view of Imami jurists,If the male offender is a female victim, the execution of the sentence is subject to the payment of a dieh. However, there are three theories among Sunni jurists, one on the practice of retribution without paying Fadhil Diyat, the other on the lack of retribution for men against women, and the payment of Diyat by female parents, and the third group believe in paying the difference in Diyat. Therefore, if a man kills a woman, the victim's family must pay the obligatory blood money to the killer (man) before retribution. But if the killer is a woman and the victim is a man, the family can apply for retribution without paying anything. There are three views in this regard: jurisprudence: a) payment of the difference between diyat b) non-payment of diyat c - non-retribution of men against women and only payment of diyat.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)