نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، رشته الهیات، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران
2 دانش آموخته سطح چهارحوزه علمیه، رشته الهیات، موسسه مطالعات راهبردی علوم و معارف اسلام حوزه مشهد، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The relationship between words and meanings is one of the topics of linguistics, and discovering the reality of such a relationship can lead to very important results in jurisprudence. The uṣūlīs (scholars of principles of jurisprudence) have dealt with this issue in the section on words discourses. There are three categories to be considered according to the validity of the relationship between words and meanings: devising, commitment and conjunction. Each one of these theories has their advantages and disadvantages. The findings of this research, which was carried out with a descriptive-analytical method and with reference to library sources, show that the relationship between words and meanings after being devised by the deviser is an inherent matter. The proof of the correctness of this theory is prompting of real favorable and unfavorable effects on words, without the need for the deviser to be aware of the inherent relationship between the words and the meanings.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)