Interference of human rights standards in party autonomy principle

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Payam Noor University, Department of Law, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.34785/J016.2019.745

Abstract

Party autonomy principle is an important and crucial principle in contract law and according to this principle the wills of the dealersgoverns all aspects of the contract unless one of these limitations containing ordering rules, public order, and good deed, results in hindrance to the enforcement of the contract. However, since the parties to the contract are not of equal status and there may be contractual inequality, the parties cannot abandoned based on autonomy principleand a strategy should be provided for contractual balance and equality. In some cases, lawmakers have developed some rules and interfered in contract relations to make a balance in the contract, but this case interference of the lawmakers cannot cause equality in the contract and removing imbalance between the parties. Through human rights standardsand its interference in private and contractual relations, imbalance can be brought back to the contract. This paper is aimed at investigating the Interference of human rights standardsin contract law and the way it should be done.

Keywords

References

Banakas,Stathis.(2006). Constitutional Human Rights and Private Law in the uk: as there an emperor inaide the new, MartinusNijhoff Publisher
Barak.Aharon.( 1996). Constitutional Human Rights and Private Law.
Barak.Aharon.( 2006). Constitutional Human Rights and Private Law. Hart Publishing Oxford and Portland, Oregon.
Beaston, (1998).Ansin, Law of Contract, 27 th sd, Oxford University
Cherednychenko, Olha O.( 2007). Fundamental rights and private law: A relationship of subordination or complementarity? http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/ Volume 3, Issue 2 (December)
Daniel and Barak-Erez, Daphne.(2006). Human rights in pariviat law , MartinusNijhoff Publishers
DANIEL AND BARAK-EREZ, DAPHNE.( 2006).human rights in pariviat law , MartinusNijhoff Publishers
Fathy, Mohmad.(1913). La doctorine musulmanc de la bus des droits(Etude d hidtorire et de droit compare) , lyon- paris
Guest, A.G.(1986). Ansin s Law of Contract, 26 th ed: Oxford , clarendon Perss
Lindenbergh, Siewert.(2010). Fundamental rights in private law: anchors or goals in a globalizing legal order?, Globalization and Private Law, Edward Elgar,Cheltenham, UK • Northampton, MA, USA Published in
McKendrick. Ewan.(2001). Negligence and Human Rights: Reconsidering Osman, in Daniel Fridman and Daphne Barak-Erez: Human Rights in Private Law,pp.331-356, Oxford and Portland:  Hart Publishing
Markesinis Basil S & Hannes Unberath and Angus Johnston.(2006). the German Law of Contract, Second Edition, USA, Hart Publishing
Quint, Peter E.(1989). Free Speech and Private Law in German Constitutional Theory, 48 Mar. L. Rev
Treitel,H(1995).The Law of Contract,9th ef: London,Maxwell&Sweet
Smits, Jan M.(2006).  Private law and fundamental rights: a sceptical vie, Published in: To Barkhuysen & Siewert Lindenbergh (eds.), Constitutionalisation of Private Law, Leiden/Bosto
Comparative Studies on the Schools of Jurisprudence and its Principles
Volume 1, Issue 1
Publisher
April 2019
Pages 126-100

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics