نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه الهیات، دانشکده علوم انسانی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، گنبدکاووس، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه الهیات، دانشکده علوم انسانی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، گنبدکاووس، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The acceptance of unilateral will as one of the sources of commitments in the comparative jurisprudence and the Iranian law is dubitable. According to the renowned majority of the Imami jurists and the Sunni jurisprudential schools, as well as some lawyers, īqā' (unilateral legal act), like a contract, cannot generally create a commitment, but is a secondary and exceptional source for commitments. However, as an unpopular opinion, īqā' is not limited to the cases foreseen in Shari'a and law, but as a general rule, it can create a commitment against its owner and for the benefit of another. Accordingly, the authors try to examine the jurisprudential and legal foundations of this issue and analyze the opinions regarding it. The data has been collected by library method and then analyzed descriptively and analytically. The results show that, in order for social trust to be established among the members of the society and the legal security of others to remain immune from attack, the expresser of the will must adhere to his commitment and not shy away from this legal commitment.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)