unnecessary development of the responsibility of the loss agent.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Lecturer, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professo , jurisprudence and foundations of Islamic low department, faculty of theology , University of Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.34785/J016.2019.780

Abstract

In Iranian law, the general rule is that indirect damages cannot be compensated. However, liability law today tends to make some indirect damages exceptionally compensable. Unfortunately, our courts face ambiguity in identifying indirect loss cases, and the key question is what are the indirect loss cases and which of these can be offset by applying the foundations of Iranian jurisprudence and law. In the current practice, Iranian courts generally attribute indirect damages to non-profits. While some of the intermediary losses in customary law have a strong relationship with the harmful act and their compensation is incompatible with the rational custom of society. The present study, using library resources, while enumerating the most important examples of indirect losses in the field of coercive guarantee, has briefly assessed their feasibility. Identifying these examples is the first step in compensating for the loss of conventional losses and preventing the Typology of indirect losses in non-contractual liability

Keywords

References

Adams. J., & Brownsword, R. (1987). Understanding Contract Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 5th Ed. Yy.
Ashley, P. S., Palmer, B., & Aldersey-Williams, J. (2014). An International Issue:'Loss of Profits' and'Consequential Loss'. Business Law International, 15(3), 261.
Brown, L. N., Bell, J., & Galabert, J. M. (1998). French administrative law. Oxford University Press.
Coulthard, W., & Partner Rebecca, C. (2017). Consequential Loss: do you know what you are excluding? Last visited on 17October 2019 http://jws.com.au/en/insights/articles/2017-articles/consequential-loss-do-you-know-what-you-are-exclud.
Elliot, C., & Frances, Q. (2009) Tort Law, seventh ed., London, Longman.
Harpwood., V. (2009). Principle of Tort Law, Forth edn., London, Cavendish Publishing,
Le Tourneau, Philippe, et al. (2008) Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats, 7e ed, Dalloz,.
Owen, R. (2000). Essential tort law , third edition , Cavendish publishing limited.
Planiol, M., & Ripert, G. (1990). Traité pratiqe de droit civil français, T.VI, Obligations, 2é èd.(paris, L.G.D.J.,)
Starck, Boris1972. Droit civil, Obligations, Librairies technniques, 1é.éd.
Van den Bergh, R., & Camesasca, P. D. (2001). European competition law and economics: a comparative perspective. Intersentia nv.
Vincent et Guinchard. (1987). procédure civile, Dalloz, paris.
Zimmermann, R. (1990). The Law of Obligation.
Comparative Studies on the Schools of Jurisprudence and its Principles
Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
October 2019
Pages 166-145

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics